Sudan, a country ravaged by a brutal civil war, has achieved an extraordinary feat by qualifying for the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON). Despite having no domestic football for years, playing all their matches away from home, and facing insurmountable challenges, Sudan’s players and staff refused to let their circumstances define them. Their qualification is a testament to resilience, hard work, and an unwavering belief in their ability to compete on the continental stage.

Meanwhile, in Ghana, the narrative is far less inspiring. The Ghana Football Association (GFA) President has drawn criticism for deflecting blame for the Black Stars’ struggles. Instead of addressing the team’s shortcomings and taking responsibility, he cited the Anas exposé, an investigative report that exposed corruption within Ghana football nearly six years ago. Many have questioned why this excuse continues to be a scapegoat for the country’s football woes, rather than a catalyst for meaningful reform.

The stark contrast between Sudan’s grit and Ghana’s lack of accountability highlights a deeper issue within the leadership of Ghanaian football. When will Ghana’s football authorities move past excuses and prioritize transparency, accountability, and genuine development for the sport?